Karachi: Two men admitted to rape a seven-year-old boy in front of a magistrate on Friday, strangled him with shoelaces and hit him with bricks.
The Investigation Officer (IO) gave birth to two sisters before the magistrate of justice (Eastern) and filed an application to record their confession statements.
Under police rules, Article 25.29: “When multiple individuals confess or turn to approvers, their confessions shall be recorded by different magistrates and they shall not be allowed to meet each other until their evidence is recorded in court.
Both sheriffs gave them enough time before recording their statements and asked them questions about their willingness to confess. The sisters made it clear to the court that they were making statements voluntarily.
After recording their confession statements, the court concerned sentenced them to judicial memory and directed the IO to file Challan within the prescribed period.
The attorney for the complainant Jahangir Kalhoro told dawn Both sisters acknowledged their guilt and noted that on the day of the incident – September 18 – around 7 p.m., they saw the boy return from a relative’s house and invited him to visit the cattle farm where they used to work.
After spending 15 to 20 minutes on the farm, both sisters sexually assaulted the boy in a room on the farm. They then tried to strangle him with shoelaces, then hit him on the head with bricks and then attack him with heavy objects, which led to his death, lawyer.
They arranged the body of a little boy, and then put the body of the little boy into it, and later recovered from an empty plot.
Advocate Kalhoro answered questions about motivations and said the sisters “brutally” murdered the boy after committing a crime of “desire” because they wanted to hide the crime.
He added that the sisters also had “personal hatred” with the complainant’s family because they had earlier sought a marriage proposal for the relatives of the deceased. After the complainant’s family refused, they developed resentment towards them.
He further pointed out that the discovery of the body was conveyed through a relative of a sister who personally contacted the ambulance driver by phone, claiming that there was no such telephone record in the Ambulance Service (Chippa).
The lawyer answered questions about whether it might be related to the case, and the lawyer said the investigation was ongoing and the victim’s family believed others were involved, including a sister and his son’s wife, who owned all the ambulances. About his personal phone number.
Posted at Dawn on September 27, 2025
