Islamabad: Five Supreme Court judges Constitutional Judges (CB) will appeal from September 29, move Tariq Mehmood Jahangiri, the Supreme Court of Islamabad (IHC) challenged Restriction order This prevented him from performing his judicial duties.
Under the leadership of Judge Aminuddin Khan, the bench will consist of Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi and Justice Shahid Bilal Hassan.
The plea filed by Judge Jahangiri himself demanded that the 16th September restriction order was put on hold and suspended while his current petition was pending, while the issuance of the judicial officer was restricted to further circumstances.
The court of two judges led by Chief Justice Sardar Mohammad Sarfraz Dogar and Justice Mohammad Azam Khan raised serious questions in the constitution while hearing a written petition filed by lawyer Mian Dawood Undericle, while issuing interim orders. Law Degree From Karachi University. The petition series Quo Warranto’s writs questioning Justice Jahangiri’s office in office.
Islamabad Law Committee filed a petition to become the political party in the case
On September 23, Justice Jahangiri also asked the Supreme Court to determine his appeal that he could only serve as an IHC judge until a specific age and time was lost due to the action of the victim order that he could not recover.
In a two-page application filed by the Supreme Court, Jahangiri said the Supreme Court must intervene urgently in the matter so that the petitioner can be restored and justice can continue to be distributed in the High Court he serves.
For urgent reasons, the application filed a critical decision that restricted the judge from performing his judicial functions did not even hear the counterattack position, adding that he had never heard of it.
Meanwhile, the Islamabad Lawyer Committee (IBC) also filed a petition to become Justice Jahangiri’s appeal. The petition was moved together by members of the IBC, namely Syed Ahmad Hassan Shah, Nase Ahmad Kiyani, Raja Muhammad Aleem Khan Abbasi, Syed Qamar Hussain Shah Sabzwari, Zulfiqar Ali Abbasi and Adil Aziz Qazi.
Under Article 185 (3), the IBC petition holds that the order of September 16 is arbitrary, capricious, and opposed to the principle of legal settlement, and it remains necessary for the Supreme Court to intervene to eliminate judicial abortion.
It is a settlement law that is, without the three superficial elements, the irreparable loss and the convenient balance of getting along with it, and the injunction cannot be passed.
Posted in Dawn on September 26, 2025
