Islamabad: Justice Tariq Mehmood Jahangiri also challenged September 16 Restriction order This prevented him from performing his judicial function, as the judge raised serious questions about the function Validity of a Law Degree From Karachi University.
The appeal filed by the Supreme Court was filed by Justice Jahangiri himself, demanding that the September 16 restraining order be suspended and the September 16th restraining order was suspended and directed the division to withdraw further.
Two judges led by Chief Justice Sardar Mohammad Sarfraz Dogar and Chief Justice Mohammad Azam Khan were heard by lawyer Mian Dawood Undericle in 199. The petition seeks Quo Warranto’s writ, questioning “by what authority” Judge Jahangiri Hero’s Judicial Office.
Justice Jahangiri cites the 2010 Iftikhar Chaudhry case in his appeal under section 185(3), in which the SC possesses the hero, i.e. the Constitution does not allow any repetitions to occur when the judge exercises judicial power or any restrictions on him? Similarly, even temporary disability placed on judges in the performance of the Constitution and official bonds is not allowed from the Constitution.
The appeal held that the September 16 order was apparently Mala Fide at its concert, contrary to what happened in the open court. It added that the restriction order was passed in a clear conflict of interest, opening the door to a serious violation of judicial independence and making larger judges of the High Court restrict the execution of their judicial functions by compatriot judges.
The appeal stresses that even if intervention in intermediate matters is an exception to the general rule, exceptions occur when the order is arbitrary, capricious and violates the principle of resolution of law.
He believes that in this case, the Supreme Court will surely intervene to prevent miscarriage. This is a settlement principle, that the injunction shall not be approved without the three ostensible prerequisites, irreparable losses and the balance of convenience being met.
However, the September 16th order is described as a non-speaking order, without the discussion of these essential elements, thus lacking the basis. It argues that the order overturned the practice of a court as a university judge, and that every action equals judicial power, who must perform their duties in a ridiculous way that upholds the ridiculous way among them.
Published on September 20, 2025
