Home » ‘Can’t be taken hostage’: SHC is angry after chaotic lawsuits in Jahangiri degree case – Pakistan

‘Can’t be taken hostage’: SHC is angry after chaotic lawsuits in Jahangiri degree case – Pakistan

by Adeel Hussain
0 comments



the next day Commotion and chaos At a hearing at the Sindh High Court (SHC) challenging The court’s written order was cancelled on Friday, and the SHC “cannot kidnap the whimsical/wish hostages of advocates in a way that expresses the petition”.

The order, available copies of dawn.comIt also said that the seven petitions have been dismissed for non-litigation.

Yesterday, after being composed of two constitutional judges, the SHC saw a commotion in the SHC, including Justices Mohammad Karim Khan Agha and Adnan-Ex-Karim Memon, who refused to accept the confession of Justice Jahangiri to become a party in the seven petitions. The bench put aside the application of the IHC judge, insurance, that is, first of all, to be in the maintainability of the petition.

However, the petitioner’s lawyers objected to the judge’s jurisdiction and urged the court to rule their objections first.

However, the court insists that it will first check and decide on the issue of maintainability.

The proceedings attracted a large number of lawyers inside and outside the court, many shouting slogans and applauding, and later protesting against a judge outside the SHC. The petitioner and their lawyers also walked out of the court to protest that their objections were not resolved and the court refused to entertain Justice Jahangiri’s plea.

The SHC bench recalled in an order issued today that he refused to make his argument when advocate Ebrahim Saifuddin was called by the petitioner’s lawyers. “According to him, the court must first decide on the preliminary objections raised by Salahuddin Ahmed and Faisal Siddiqui.”

Similarly, the bench observed that when Siddiki was asked to speak to the court on the issue of maintainability, he also argued that objections regarding the jurisdiction of the court should be ruled first. “When his request was rejected by the bench, he left the court and said he would not go further.”

Regarding another request, the bench stated by order: “The petitioner was present without any intimacy. () The petitioner may have left the court because he did not want to argue about the matter”.


And more



Source link

You may also like

Leave a Comment