Rights activist and lawyer Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir filed a letter of complaint on Friday about her “inaction” in workplace harassment complaint against Chief Justice of the High Court of Islamabad (IHC).
Judge Dogar has warn Masari Temp looks at the court case, and it is reported that warning remarks have been passed along the remarks of “catch her”. The bodies of multiple lawyers release Condemn the statement and call on the judge to fire from the position of senior IHC judge.
September 15, Mazarri Get up The IHC and the Supreme Judicial Commission (SJC) committee of inquiry filed complaints against women’s harassment under section 4 of the Workplace Act 2010 (an inquiry process held).
Justice Saman Rafat Imtiaz recognizes the IHC government Stripping Her power judge entertains harassment complaints. Instead, IHC Justice Inaam Ameen Minhas was appointed as the authority to oversee the case. This prompted Mazari method The Supreme Judicial Committee (SJC) opposes Justice Dogar’s complaint of harassment against a female judge.
In today’s letter, to Justice Minhas – a copy of it can be provided dawn.com – Mazarri said the competent authorities under the bill “required that the allegations be communicated to the defendant within three days of the complaint, and the defendant must submit a written defense within seven days of conveying the allegations to him”.
“I was not aware of my complaint status because I was not informed by the competition authorities in this regard,” she wrote.
Mazari called for “clear caution” to resolve the issue, saying: “I requested the earliest remedy to my complaint.”
She also proposed the removal of Justice Imtiaz as the competent authority and appointed Justice Minhas as a replacement, saying the move was “illegal” as “illegal” because “the defendant cannot change the competent authority or block my competence by abusing his power status”.
After the complaint, she also highlighted CJ Dogar’s “continuous act of revenge.” “If you have to realize that under the 2010 Act, such retaliation is strictly prohibited and as the competent authority, you have to make sure I am not affected by the number of such times,” she said.
According to the letter, on September 16, the case of Mahrang Baloch, a client of Mahrang Baloch, was fixed before him for a hearing, and because of the pending complaint, Mahrang’s agent consulting transferred the case to any other judge.
“The defendant refused to transfer the case and asked me to appear before him, although by law, no woman was treated like this in front of her so-called harasser.”
“The above facts and circumstances clearly describe the accused’s abuse of authority violated in my complaint,” she noted.
Mazarri further stated that her application to save CCTV footage from the day of the incident remains “unresolved” and requests “immediate intervention to ensure this critical evidence”.
Mazary submitted application Save CCTV footage of the “unfortunate incident” that happened with her with the IHC’s registrar.
In the application, she said: “I write to you today to seek CCTV footage on the court of Honor of Justice, from Court No. 1 between 9am and 11am on September 11, 2025, as the unfortunate incident occurred in the signed lawyer and the result was the result of the exchange record on CCTV footage.
“I also asked() to start with the analysis date and time on Aphorefimate’s USB and I’ve swallowed a copy of that instant application.”
