Tariq Mehmood Jahangiri, the Supreme Court of Islamabad (IHC), has tried his guilty plea early with the Supreme Court, challenging September 16 Restriction order This prevented him from performing his judicial functions as judges from the IHC zoning raised serious questions about the validity of the legal degree at Karachi University (KU), which emerged on Tuesday.
one complain Judges related to Judge Jahangiri’s alleged false degree submitted to the Supreme Judicial Commission in July last year, while a petition challenging his appointment was filed earlier this year with the IHC. Events centered on one letter It began circulating on social media last year, allegedly based on KU’s examination controller, about the law of judges.
In a remarkable development last week, the IHC restricted Justice Jahangiri from exercising his judicial power with the judicial power of two-term judges, led by Chief Justice Mohammad Sarfraz Dogar and composed by Justice Mohammad Azam Khan, the winger who issued interim orders. A written petition filed by lawyer Mian Dawood under Article 199 of the Constitution. Justice Jahangiri Challenged The decision on Friday at SC demanded a shelves the restraining order during the premises of the petition and suspended the suspension and directed the division’s bench to further further strategies.
The judge then submitted an application that can be used with dawn.coma hearing a day ago through advocate Syed Rifaqat Hussain Shah.
The application states that the judgment is restricted from performing its judicial functions but cannot allocate justice, although the legal “settlement” believes that such restrictive orders cannot be used to prevent the advanced course from performing his functions.
“This case involves important issues related to the functions of the High Court judges and the independence of the judiciary, which has attracted attention in any jurisdiction. Therefore, urgent intervention in this course is required.
The application said: “The order of the judgment opens the lawsuit, any pending reference/complaint/petition against any judge, may allow the High Court to prevent him from performing his functions. Therefore, urgent intervention from this Court is required to correct the course and prevent such litigation in order to enable the performance of the High Court judge.”
It held that the orders ordered were passed without taking into account Daward’s goodwill, adding that the petition could not be maintained without such goodwill.
Therefore, such determination must be made at the outset to close the door to any such MALA FIDE lawsuit against constitutional staff. The crucial decision to restrict the judge from performing his functions is made without hearing about mating. The sustainability of petitions filed on the petitioner’s application must be prevented in case of unnecessary litigation, to prevent unnecessary litigation, and unnecessary litigation measures, unnecessary litigation, and unnecessary demands are unnecessary. The court he serves.
“The petitioner can only serve as a judge of the High Court until a certain age, and the time wasted due to being obstructed from the operation of the order cannot be restored by him. Therefore, the court must intervene in the matter urgently, so it can be restored and can be evaluated in the High Court and can be discussed in the High Court,” the application said.
The judge demanded that his petition be scheduled for a hearing this week.
This matter is just one of the controversies that plague the IHC because the five judges – namely, Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani, Babar Sattar, Jahangiri, Saman Rafat Imtiaz and Sardar Ejaz Ishaq Khan – A separate petition was submitted On Friday, the Supreme Court jointly addressed many issues affecting the court, from the composition of the bench to the roster to the transfer of cases.
